Insights category
9 published articles in this category.
Articles
September 11, 2026 · 18 min
Most commentary points at the wrong clause. Under CCDC 2 the tariff provision is GC 10.1, it adjusts the price automatically, and it runs in both directions — but claims are won and lost on quantum and notice.
Read the full articleAugust 18, 2026 · 9 min
Time Impact Analysis, as-planned vs as-built, windows, collapsed as-built — the method is an evidentiary decision, not a preference.
Read the full articleMay 26, 2026 · 6 min
When a dispute turns on 400,000 documents, review cost decides whether the claim is worth pursuing. That calculation has changed.
Read the full articleApril 30, 2026 · 7 min
Disruption claims fail more often than delay claims. Usually because productivity was asserted rather than measured.
Read the full articleAugust 28, 2026 · 10 min
An extension of time is not granted because the project is late. It is granted because a specific event, for which the other party bears risk, moved the critical path — and the record proves it.
Read the full articleJuly 16, 2026 · 9 min
Once the time is established, the cost has to be built from the accounting record. Formula-based head office claims are where most quantum submissions lose credibility.
Read the full articleSeptember 2, 2026 · 9 min
Most delay analyses fail at the as-built stage. Rebuilding what actually happened, from daily records rather than from updated programmes, is the work that decides the outcome.
Read the full articleAugust 28, 2026 · 8 min
Concurrency is where extension of time and cost recovery part company. Understanding that split before you submit changes what you argue.
Read the full articleAugust 22, 2026 · 8 min
Presenting the whole overrun as one figure looks efficient and is the most common reason quantum submissions are discounted outright.
Read the full articleContact
Tell us what stage you are at. We will tell you plainly what the records support and what we would do next.
